Dari empat ekor yang tetas, tinggal 3 ekor sekarang. sekor mati jatuh reban.
Walaupun jantan yg digunaka dgn induk Srii ni jenis rinting, Bulu ketiga tiga anak ni belum ada yang rinting lagi, apapun sgkp akan tunggu sampai remaja untuk tgk sama ada anak ni ada darah rinting atau darah pembaka tempat sgkp beli induk Srii.
First time ambil gambar solo, Takut lagi ayam ni.
Saturday, 16 February 2013
Friday, 1 February 2013
Website yg baik untuk peminat serama
Kali ni sgkp nak share dgn rakan rakan laman sesawang yg memberi byk maklumat tentang perternakan. Mungkin ada maklumat yang berguna kepada breeder breeder serama untuk menambah baik baka reban dan sebagainya. Yang paling sgkp suka ialah mengenai "inbreeding" sebab sgkp memang merancang utk buat inbreeding bg menghasilkan anak reban yg sgkp sasarkan. Selepas membaca artikel di laman sesawang tersebut mengenai inbreeding, tahulah apa yang perlu sgkp buat sekiranya melakukan inbreeding. Harap rakan rakan yg lain dapat manafaat dari laman tersebut.
http://web.archive.o...ages/page0.html
http://web.archive.o...ages/page0.html
There are varied
opinions regarding the issue of inbreeding. One school of thought contends that
inbreeding is a negative thing and brings about depression in traits such as
fertility, hatchability, rate of lay and others. Another school of thought
maintains that the negative aspects of inbreeding can be controlled and even
eliminated to a large extent through intelligent selection.
Several studies were
conducted in the early part of the twentieth century (for a brief synopsis, see
Crawford, Elsevier, 1990, Chapter 39) that showed essentially disasterous
results when full sibling fowl were mated for several generations. However,
even in the first generation of progeny from full sibling matings in these
early studies, traits such as hatchability and rate of lay were seriously
depressed. These early studies are largely responsible for many people
believing that inbreeding in poultry is universally negative.
Other poultry
enthusiasts are aware that inbreeding in plants is a very successful strategy
in developing hardy strains with desirable traits. They also recognize that
most lines of show-quality poultry are inbred. Research performed in the 1970s
and later (see Crawford) on inbreeding in chickens (Leghorns), turkeys, quail,
pheasants and partridge fowl showed that desirable traits such as rate of lay,
hatchability and fertility can be selected for in inbred lines. These traits
can recover from the initial depression due to inbreeding, sometimes even to
the same level as the non-inbred lines. A 1988 study by Ameli and co-workers
showed that long-term selection against the negative effects of inbreeding can
be successful in recovering traits such as high rate of lay and fertility in
Leghorn populations.
The depression in traits
seen in (random, nonselective) inbreeding, such as fertility, hatchability and
rate of lay, is often due to recessive genes. If the depression of these traits
were due to dominant genes, the depression would be expressed and observed in
non-inbred lines and would not be a phenomenon associated with inbreeding.
Epistasis or Epistacy (the interaction of genes at different locations on
chromosomes) is sometimes invoked to explain aspects of inbreeding depression.
As of this writing,
inbreeding experiments ongoing at the University of Arkansas have associated
the greater part of inbreeding depression on hatchability to the male. The
evidence for this is the following. Inbred females were mated to a range of
different males and the hatchability of their eggs was observed. Inbred males
were bred to a range of different females and the hatchability of their eggs
were observed. The hatchability of eggs from inbred males was substantially
lower than the hatchability of eggs from inbred females, regardless of the
cross. So, for example, the hatchability of eggs from a father-daughter cross
in which the father is an inbred individual was about the same as the
hatchability of eggs from a mating of the same male with non-inbred females.
This is strong evidence that the inbreeding depression of hatchability is
largely a property of the male birds.
The fact remains that,
if the backyard fancier allows inbreeding to take place and does not actively
select against the negative effects of inbreeding, the entire population will
perform at a lower level with respect to fertility, hatchability, rate of lay
and and so on. On the other hand, the objective evidence is convincing that it
is possible to develop successful inbred lines of poultry through active
selection for desireable traits.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)